Ash Dieback Survey

Maintaining your land to ensure it does not pose a hazard to visitors or trespassers is a legal obligation. You could be held responsible for any property damage or personal injuries that occur on your premises. This is why it is crucial to be vigilant about the condition of any trees on your property. We offer guidance on continuous monitoring and surveying.

Contact Form

Assessing trees for ash dieback

As a landowner, if you possess ash trees, it is incumbent upon you to conduct regular surveys for disease indicators. Should the disease be detected, you are obliged to respond appropriately, considering any potential risks to public safety.


What is ash dieback?


Ash dieback, also known as 'Chalara,' is a highly contagious fungal disease poised to decimate over 90% of native ash trees, along with most other ash species. The disease compromises the tree by infiltrating its network of vessels responsible for transporting water, nutrients, and gases, swiftly diminishing the tree's essential functions. This leads to vessel obstruction, branch girdling, and ultimately, the death of the affected part. The majority of trees infected with Ash dieback are likely to perish, either from the disease itself or from secondary infections like Honey fungus, which exploit the tree's compromised state and weakened defences. However, a small proportion of ash trees seem to be resistant to the disease, and their genetic markers are being studied in hopes of cultivating disease-resistant ash trees for the future.


Ash species affected


While our sole native ash species (Fraxinus excelsior) and its varieties are particularly vulnerable, it is also recognized that Narrow-leaved ash is susceptible. The RHS has identified the following non-native trees as vulnerable:

  • Manna Ash
  • Black Ash, Green or Red Ash
  • White Ash
  • Manchurian Ash
  • Among these, White Ash and Manchurian Ash are considered to be the least susceptible. It is important to note that Mountain Ash trees (Sorbus aucuparia sp) are actually a separate botanical species and are not affected.


You will need to consider whether active intervention is required or not.


Key things to be aware of are:


  • Trees on your land are your responsibility
  • Once ash die back has infected an ash tree the tree can be at considerable risk of structural failure. The tree can shed branches and limbs, or the whole tree may even collapse.
  • Large trees have the potential to kill or seriously injure people and damage property and vehicles – this should be the paramount consideration for tree owners when deciding how to manage ash trees affected by ash die back.
  • A key health & safety consideration for tree owners should be “what is in the target area around the tree should it fall or shed limbs?”. For example the risk posed by the tree to infrastructure (power lines, gas lines & telecoms), highways, areas around occupied buildings (especially schools, hospitals, shops, housing & offices etc) and other peopled areas, should be very carefully considered.
  • Preventing Access to Trees – if a tree owner has concerns about the safety of a tree, it may be prudent to cordon off the tree(s) to prevent access to the area where a tree may fall, as a short-term measure until a tree can be properly inspected.
  • Inspection of Trees should, it is recommended, be carried out initially by a competent tree inspector who has relevant professional expertise and qualifications to assess the tree and recommend an appropriate course of action i.e. to carry out tree surgery /removal, or to do nothing and /or monitor the situation. A robust monitoring system would then involve interim inspections by landowners in between professional inspections.
  • Tree Surgery should always be carried out by a competent tree surgeon who has relevant expertise and qualifications.
  • Disclaimer – this is not intended to be an exhaustive Health & Safety Guide, only a list of the key considerations for tree owners.


Useful guidance on managing and mapping the risks from trees can be found at the National Tree Safety Group Guidance. Whilst ash dieback is not specifically mentioned it is considered the document is comprehensive enough in its guidance and scenarios that parallels can readily be taken and applied to management of tress infected by the disease.

  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button

Trees in high risk locations

  • The risks posed by trees is determined by its target area and the potential for harm to occur should partial or whole tree failure happen, and its effect on people and property in these situations. Should no target exist, then there is no risk to people or buildings and infrastructure. High target e.g. major road networks- Low target e.g. Low use public footpath.
  • Target:  person or object, whether mobile or fixed, within the potential zone of impact of a tree or its branches, which might be harmed as a result of the partial or total failure of the tree NOTE The term can also refer to a pedestrian or vehicular route where harm might thus occur.
  • Risk control: If the purpose of the tree work is to control risks to people or property, the relative priority of the work should be determined by a tree failure risk assessment. Decisions about priority should take account of any relevant factors that vary with the time of year, such as site usage, windiness, occurrence of drought or waterlogging, the potential for snowfall and unseasonal frost, or hazards associated with certain species at particular times of year, that are likely to influence the degree of risk to people, including operators, and property.


When to take action

  • It is becoming widely accepted that once more than 50% of a tree’s canopy is observed to be affected by ash dieback (and not a separate disorder) it is unlikely that the tree will recover. At this point its levels of vigour are likely to be such that the tree will be unable to resist other diseases. It is possible that it will be the effects of these secondary pathogens that will lead to tree failure and not the actions of ash dieback in the first instance, however in risk management terms the site owner/ manager will see little difference.
  • The girdling effect of the disease occasionally observed upon branches and stems, particularly at branch junctions, may lead to fracture at these points due to increased local stresses on dysfunctional wood. Close observation should therefore be made to determine the extent of any lesion and its location if it is desired to retain the tree for any reason.
  • As deadwood sections increase in size they are likely to be shed and where vulnerable targets are in the fall path, works are expected to become necessary to control the risk, either by way of whole tree felling, pruning out dead/ dangerous parts or moving the target where possible.  Again, it is important to have a clear understanding of the relationship of the tree to targets so that proportionate and appropriate management interventions are undertaken, if any.


Monitoring the situation

  • If an initial survey of ash trees on your land shows no signs of the disease, please monitor the situation and plan to survey again – we recommend that tree surveys are no more than two years old.

Tree Inspections and Surveys for Ash Dieback


Qualifications 


The Inspector must possess the appropriate qualifications to conduct tree inspections. Many organizations now mandate that their inspectors have qualifications at QCF level 4 (or its equivalent). However, they may also accept inspections performed by inspectors with qualifications as low as QCF level 3 (or its equivalent). We are qualified to QCF level 6.


Specialist Inspections 


In some situations the inspector may need to carry out detailed tree investigations, for example:

  • There may be a requirement for an inspector to climb a tree using ropes. If so, the inspector will need to be appropriately qualified and be accompanied by a colleague qualified in aerial rescue.
  • Some trees of significant importance may need to be assessed using specialist tree survey equipment like resistograph drilling or sonic tomography (which can be costly) – it is wise to ensure that the costs and justification for this are clearly identified in advance of work being carried out.



Generally, Surveys should take place between July and September as trees need to be in full leaf to give an accurate reading. 

Our arboriculturists can undertake Phase 1 surveys during this time. Below is our process for assessing the impact on large estates and large groups. We conduct ad hoc inspections on individual trees and create a treatment and monitoring plan according .


Ash dieback survey process


Phase 1 surveys identify: 

  • Areas of significance, levels of infection, clearance impact and classify the percentage of any dieback if found. The clearance impact is important because removing one tree in a woodland will not have significant an impact on the landscape as removing a lone tree in a field.


Phase 2 surveys identify:

  • The number of stems that need to be removed, management plan if appropriate and restocking levels. Depending on the size of the plot, a Phase 2 survey can also be done at Phase 1 stage, or on a return visit.


After each survey phase we provide a full report with our findings

Professional  Tree Surveyors who can undertake ash dieback inspections

Our expert tree consultants will recommend suitable management recommendations following surveys and reports.

Contact Form
Share by: